noname wrote:
The second Ad is discussing! There is going to be children watching the Super Bowl. Glad I am not planning on watching it anyhow. There is nothing wrong with the first ad. It is something to really think about. How many Aborted Children could have made a difference in this World. Just like Obama is? Good or Bad. Or rather a person would agree with them or not.
Using
Internet Explorer 7.0 on
Windows XP
31 January 2009 14:58:49
31 January 2009 14:58:49
HappyG wrote:
The PETA ad is porn. I don't want my grandkids to have sex with vegetables, or even entertain the idea. This ad is disgusting.
Using
Internet Explorer 7.0 on
Windows XP
31 January 2009 16:39:38
31 January 2009 16:39:38
danimal wrote:
On one hand, I want to eat a salad right now.
On the other, I see a few paid Ho's with no morals, selling themselves to PETA no matter how dam stupid it looks. And a pumpkin? What the hell is she going to do with that thing?
If they are going to edit it, I say, Put on some clothes, and an apron, put the veggies back in the kitchen, on the cutting board and take a dildo....err... I mean knife, and cut up a salad....thats what real women do. (men too)
....and now......After several days of negotiations, an NBC representative in Chicago told CatholicVote.org today that NBC and the NFL are not interested in advertisements involving "political advocacy or issues."
OOOOO REALLY? Seems to me they did just that for a year and a half with hundreds of election ads......NBC...Never Been Cool.
On the other, I see a few paid Ho's with no morals, selling themselves to PETA no matter how dam stupid it looks. And a pumpkin? What the hell is she going to do with that thing?
If they are going to edit it, I say, Put on some clothes, and an apron, put the veggies back in the kitchen, on the cutting board and take a dildo....err... I mean knife, and cut up a salad....thats what real women do. (men too)
....and now......After several days of negotiations, an NBC representative in Chicago told CatholicVote.org today that NBC and the NFL are not interested in advertisements involving "political advocacy or issues."
OOOOO REALLY? Seems to me they did just that for a year and a half with hundreds of election ads......NBC...Never Been Cool.
Using
Internet Explorer 7.0 on
Windows XP
01 February 2009 06:53:16
01 February 2009 06:53:16
HappyG wrote:
On one hand, I say let them show that piece of dung, and let the entire world see how low NBC and PETA have sunk. For some reason, I bought salad mix, yesterday. It's already prepared in the bag...and I won't be tempted! It's a good thing meat eaters aren't putting on an ad!
Using
Internet Explorer 7.0 on
Windows XP
01 February 2009 07:52:55
01 February 2009 07:52:55
M. wrote:
Not a surprise that NBC (or any other liberal media tool) would refuse to run a pro-life ad even when it is congratulating their "messiah", Barack Obama. The ad makes a point that they do not want people to be aware of - among all those aborted babies are people who might have made a difference in this world. If you wonder where all the true hereos and positive contributors to society are in this age, maybe their remains were tossed in an abortionist's garbage receptical. The people born after Roe v. Wade are the generation of survivors. 1/3 of the people who should have been born in this country were not, because it is legal to have your own baby murdered. Just because something is legal does not make it moral or ethical.
Using
Internet Explorer 7.0 on
Windows XP
08 February 2009 13:52:24
08 February 2009 13:52:24






![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://www.lucente.org/images/valid-rss.png)

NBC wrong to nix pro-life ad
I find it outrageous that NBC refused to carry this ad during its Super Bowl broadcast tomorrow.
Despite how you feel about abortion, all groups have the right to express their opinions. The airwaves are owned by the people and NBC and its affiliates are only licensed to use them. While I disagree with this arrangement, that is how it is. Because of that, NBC should not be rejecting ads based on the message.
What is more appalling is that NBC told CatholicVote.org that it would not accept the ad because it won't accept advocacy or issue ads. However, as is pointed out in the news release below, NBC told People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals that it would accept its now-infamous sex ad "Veggie Love" if it made certain changes toning down the sexual content (the "Veggie Love" ad can be found at the bottom of this post). So apparently, PETA ads are acceptable so long as they are not too sexual, but an anti-abortion ad, tastefully done, is not.
Funny thing about that, I don't even think PETA expected its ad to be accepted. I think it probably created the ad knowing it was too sexual for TV in hopes that NBC's rejection would spark interest in the ad on the Internet. Conversely, CatholicVote.org had no reason to expect its ad would be rejected.
I guess this is life in 21st century America. Honest debate is restricted to issue approved by the powerful.
The news release:
'Veggie Love': PETA's Banned Super Bowl Ad
tags: abortion, super, bowl, catholicvote.org, peta, advertising, airwaves, spectrum
category | Free Speech
author | Lucente