17 January 2010

[COLUMN] Federal aid to Haiti illegal

Haiti

By now, most of us have seen the devastation in Haiti. Sometimes, living in the modern world, with the technology to beam images of death and destruction in high-definition color right to our handheld devices, televisions and computer screens, is a curse.

However, as the latest natural disaster has proved, that curse is a two-edged sword. The very technology that is delivering pictures of the bodies in the streets and collapsed school buildings is also giving Americans the opportunity to assist those in the disaster area very quickly.

It is now possible to donate by sending a text message from a cellular phone. For example, to donate $10 to the Red Cross, just text the message "Haiti" to the number 90999.

Done.

What this shows is that Americans, as a whole, are a generous lot. Citizens have already donated millions of dollars to the relief effort.

That is how it is supposed to work.

Unfortunately, our politicians love to be generous with money that does not belong to them. President Barack Obama is no exception. He has pledged to give the stricken country at least $100 million.

However, he lacks the legal authority to do so.

I have thumbed through my well-worn copy of the U.S. Constitution (OK, it is no longer so well-worn as I have retired my pocket Constitution in favor of an electronic one on my Palm Pre) and I have been unable to place my finger on the exact section and paragraph that says the federal government can give money from the public treasury for acts of benevolence or philanthropy.

That is because it does not exist.

The U.S. Constitution is a limiting document operating under the Enumerated Powers Doctrine. Simply put, that means the federal government has no power that is not specifically listed in the Constitution. It is not a living document that changes with the times. It means what it says.

James Madison, as the father of the Constitution (a moniker he rejected), should know. As a congressman, he argued against aid for French refugees (from the Haitian Revolution of all places) and said he could not "undertake to lay [his] finger on that article of the federal Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."

President S. Grover Cleveland, perhaps one of our last presidents who actually understood the Constitution, knew that when, in 1887, he vetoed a bill appropriating $10,000 in federal aid to buy seeds for Texas farmers suffering from drought because he could "find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution."

Of course, our government stopped acting lawfully decades ago so say goodbye to hundreds of millions of tax dollars that we don't even have.

I was slightly amused, however, when Obama, while pledging to give away other people's money, told the Haitians to be patient and that it could be several days before the aid arrived because "roads are impassable, the main port is badly damaged and communication is just coming on line."

Sound familiar?

Of course, when the federal government was faced with the exact same problem in Louisiana following Hurricane Katrina in 2005 (along with violence against aid providers), President George W. Bush was pilloried by the liberal media.

What Hurricane Katrina reminded us then and Haiti reiterates now is that despite all our technology, sometimes we still have no way of easily bypassing the obstacles that appear during natural disasters.

Ultimately, though, the real lesson of Haiti is more philosophical. It is a reminder of the frailty of the human condition despite the indomitability of our spirit.

There is not a place on this planet safe from some sort of natural disaster, whether it be the routine ones such as earthquakes, hurricanes, volcanoes, tornadoes, tsunamis, or the rarer but potentially more damaging ones such as an asteroid hit or the eruption of one of the seven known super volcanoes (such as the one at Yellowstone National Park, which scientists say is overdue for an eruption).

The Haiti earthquake should serve as a reminder to us all to enjoy every moment to its fullest for we never know if it will be our last.



The Obaminator cares or probably knows very little about constitutional law. Either way this fits his cahos theory of statist government. Power at the end of a gun. Mao would be proud, even as the mentor of the marxists looks up to us in agony from his enternal torment in Hell.
Using Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 09:07:06
You are right again, Tom. This is about phoney feel-good, rather than doing the right thing. Haiti has gotten billions in aid, as well as hundreds, or maybe even thousands of Church and other humanitarian organizations are there all the time giving aid. The money is eaten up by the government and doesn't reach the people. After charity organizations leave the country, thugs rob the poor of their newly gotten necessities. There are only 3 million people in Haiti, and by most accounts, would be in a good position materially, had they received the money or goods.

The Dominican Republic is next door. Though they have their poor as well, it doesn't have the corruption Haiti is filled with.
Using Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 09:53:31
Well said. Nice op piece...
Using Google Chrome Google Chrome 3.0.195.38 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 19:09:00
@Russ,

I think he knows constitutional law, just not the Constitution. Unfortunately, our body of law regarding the Constitution has mostly destroyed the Constitution, thanks to FDR and the New Deal court, which basically rewrote constitutional law giving the Congress and the president unprecedented power.

~tjl~
Using Google Chrome Google Chrome 4.0.266.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 19:38:10
@HappyG:

Decades of poor government (and U.S. interference) has caused this. There was no reason for 7.0 earthquake to cause such devastation in the modern world. That same quake could have hit California and there might not have been a single casualty. That is the real tragedy here. All that U.S. money lined the pockets of crooks rather than help the people. But that is the problem with U.S. foreign aid, we really don't care what happens to it once it leaves our treasury.

~tjl~
Using Google Chrome Google Chrome 4.0.266.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 19:40:24
@Buster,

Thanks!

~tjl~
Using Google Chrome Google Chrome 4.0.266.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 19:40:39
Tom, do you really think he doesn't "know" the Constitution? I get the feeling he knows it VERY well but doesn't agree with it or have any respect for it.
Using Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows Windows Vista
17 January 2010 20:17:19
By know, I mean understand. I have heard interviews with him when he explains his views on the Constitution and they are clearly out of whack, not only with reality, but with a majority of Americans. He believes the Constitution is archaic because it doesn't give people things, it only has negatives, telling government what it can't do. Of course, that is the point, but he misses it completely.
Using Google Chrome Google Chrome 4.0.295.0 on Windows Windows Vista
17 January 2010 21:59:08
Although I disagree with your opinin about prisedent Obama and his decision to send fedral aid to Haiti ,but I like your way in explaining the constitution ,I hope you will continue to aply this great understandings with another president
Using Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 22:58:32
Thank you, ahmed, I shall try to do so.
Using Google Chrome Google Chrome 4.0.295.0 on Windows Windows XP
17 January 2010 23:59:32
This government and the UN globalcrats
have been giving money and aid to Haiti
for decades, our government alone gave
over a quarter of a billion dollars in 2009.
The Haiti population has increased from
5 million people in 1982 to 10 million people in 2009
all that money and aid over the last 20 years
and now double the poverty! What will the
next disaster be like when there's 20 million
people. Time to pull the plug on that country.
Using Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows Windows Vista
18 January 2010 18:11:03
I don't think Obama cares about
the Constitution one way or the
other, he had his political beliefs
instilled in him by his socialist
grandfather and his socialist friends
at a very young age. There's no room
in his heart for the Constiitution.
I caught him on "Meet the Press"
a few months ago and he was ask
what he thought the role of the
government was, this is what he
said 'I believe the role of the
government is to balance our
liberties with our need to look out
for each other' I'll leave it up to you
to decide of that is a Marxist statement
or a socialist statement or fascist statement.
Using Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows Windows Vista
18 January 2010 18:24:52
 

Allowed BBCode:[b] [i] [u] [s] [color=] [size=] [quote] [code] [email] [img] [youtube]

Comments must be approved before being published.